Should the current Staff and site rules be member set?

[centurion01]

So on a legitimate poll, whether you agree or disagree..
The mods have edited it.. once again abusing their powers...

Again justifying that some abuse their powers.

As for the rules, and punishments they do need looking at.
Yes the mods ban reocurring ban dodgers, as for the comments left they are lacking on some, ban dodger is fine, explainations like underage etc are fine, but some mods put "no" etc wtf does that mean... seriously...

Theres a rule about posting 1 add a month, some mods follow this rule others dont, ive seen many occurance over the years where users have posted more than one advert a week and no action taken.
I get that the mods and admin have lives outside of this site, but if they cant afford to spend the time on their role then why stay a mod..

Yes there are a lot of 1 time use member who join make a thread or a advert, then never come back.

Perhaps a can create a thread until X days active or X comments etc..
This would cut down on the dead threads, and people posting to threads years old.

For dead threads, say ones not commented or posted on in.. 2months, put them in to a archived section where they are closed and unavailable to be posted onto.

But seriously a mod is supposed to lead by example and changing a poll and falsifying the results isnt whats needed and just put my point across that some staff need removing.