✖ ✖ A Proposition Question for the Ladies ✖

[Leopard]

Person A has had a somewhat successful career (let's say he's 30, not fat or hairy) and has made around $9 million. Then he finds out that he has a disease, a medical time bomb in his brain that means he will die in 6 months. There will be no other symptoms or sickness beforehand.

Because of this, Person A has decided to hire a girl for 3 months. She will be paid $3 million for this time. There will be a week of initial meetings to talk in public locations, and have several play sessions, then after that she will be in his mansion unable to leave (outside phone calls are allowed.) Basically her life will be on hold for the 3 months. She will be paid weekly in advance for her time.

The condition is that she must obey everything he says, with the only limits being permanent damage / dangerous activities, and illegal activities. Her health and wellbeing must also be cared for the entire time (proper meals, exercise, talk, etc.) Once she commits she must complete the full 3 months.

So the question is: how many girls would go for this? What sorts of worries or stipulations would you have?

[sweetsong]

I don't know if I can be separated from my iPhone for that long....

And I think I'd be worried about all the normal things. o.o Like is he a psycho or a liar or or or....

Millions of $$ make it tempting though. ;D

[Leopard]

Originally Posted by sweetsong

I don't know if I can be separated from my iPhone for that long....

And I think I'd be worried about all the normal things. o.o Like is he a psycho or a liar or or or....

Millions of $$ make it tempting though. ;D

Well the psycho/liar stuff is why there's a week or two of meetings first, are paid in advances so you know you aren't being cheated, and are encouraged to keep in general contact with other people. Obviously someone could be a psycho that seems nice for awhile then locks you up, but that's a risk with anyone xD

I was thinking it'd be more a question of peoples' personal ethics: i.e. it's essentially prostitution, but it's also a one time engagement with you choosing the client and a huge payout - really no different from a gold digger marrying a rich old man.

You can have your iPhone, just not sit on it the entire day :P

[jlstockton25]

Hmm as a psychology major this question/scenario definitely intrigued me. It sort of comes down to "how much money would it take to sell your freedom."

For me personally, even if I didn't have a family of my own, no amount of money would entice me to give up my freedom for three months. Hypothetically I think you're trying to get the point across that everything in this scenario is on the up and up payout and mental health wise, but even in the "perfect situation" I don't think I could completely give myself up for three months for money.

I think there comes a time when even the most submissive human gives in to the desire for autonomy. In a consensual Dom/slave relationship where no money is at stake, the power lies in the hands of the submissive partner to determine if lines have been crossed. However, add in a financial aspect and those lines quickly become blurred.

I might even go so far as to say that if a woman was to agree to these terms as is, and never protest to any request from "person A," their mental health may become permanently altered. Humans simply aren't meant to not think for themselves all the time. Giving yourself over 100% to a partner for hours or possibly days at a time is feasible, but not being able to say no at all unless your physical health is at risk for three months has the potential to have a serious impact on how you view the world when time is up, even if you consent.

To alter this situation so that I would agree to it, I would need the length of time of my submission to be in much shorter increments. If someone offered me 3 million to follow their every command (save for putting myself in dangerous situations) for three hours a day for a year I'd be much more likely to agree to those terms. I would need to be able to retain my identity, and I feel like the proposition as is simply doesn't allow for that.

[Leopard]

Originally Posted by jlstockton25

Hmm as a psychology major this question/scenario definitely intrigued me. It sort of comes down to "how much money would it take to sell your freedom."

For me personally, even if I didn't have a family of my own, no amount of money would entice me to give up my freedom for three months. Hypothetically I think you're trying to get the point across that everything in this scenario is on the up and up payout and mental health wise, but even in the "perfect situation" I don't think I could completely give myself up for three months for money.

I think there comes a time when even the most submissive human gives in to the desire for autonomy. In a consensual Dom/slave relationship where no money is at stake, the power lies in the hands of the submissive partner to determine if lines have been crossed. However, add in a financial aspect and those lines quickly become blurred.

I might even go so far as to say that if a woman was to agree to these terms as is, and never protest to any request from "person A," their mental health may become permanently altered. Humans simply aren't meant to not think for themselves all the time. Giving yourself over 100% to a partner for hours or possibly days at a time is feasible, but not being able to say no at all unless your physical health is at risk for three months has the potential to have a serious impact on how you view the world when time is up, even if you consent.

To alter this situation so that I would agree to it, I would need the length of time of my submission to be in much shorter increments. If someone offered me 3 million to follow their every command (save for putting myself in dangerous situations) for three hours a day for a year I'd be much more likely to agree to those terms. I would need to be able to retain my identity, and I feel like the proposition as is simply doesn't allow for that.

Fantastic answer! I was thinking much the same thing - I was actually going to change permanent damage to permanent physical damage because I thought that permanent mental changes may well be in inevitable, but I didn't want it to be too leading.

The scenario I had in my mind was that the female would remain present in the house, on call if needed, so to speak, but basically free to use a computer / iphone (hence encouraged to speak with friends, browse, whatever) so as to retain perspective and identity. But I suppose a lot of people need to actually get out and amongst others to do that, too.

[EmmaLang]

I would do it no problem.

No limits and no bouderies.

[jlstockton25]

Even with regular technological access, I'd still feel like I needed basic human interaction or I'd start to lose my mind lol.

If there were scheduled nights (say 5 of the 7 nights of the week), plus bonuses for coming when it wasn't predetermined that would increase my odds of consenting a ton. That way I would still feel like I had some sense of control over my life, and both parties would still be mostly satisfied.