Go Back   getDare Truth or Dare > Special > getDare.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2016, 12:49 AM   #16
Words
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iSpuds View Post
(Dominant approaches...? Tbh one should only use a polite approach when contacting a sub for the first time...)
While I recognise this is a pansexual site, perhaps I should have said earlier that I am a male only interested in playing with other men: the gay BDSM community (within which I've many years' experience, mainly offline) tends, in my experience, to have a somewhat different set of values and customs. Even so, I normally take a very polite initial approach, but sometimes an ad by a confident male sub indicates or indeed makes blatantly clear that it is not what he wants. And, come to think of it, I've actually had more success in the past with the "more dominant" first approach - usually just a subtle difference in tone. But I'd only use it where male subs seem to want it... horses for courses.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iSpuds View Post
Actually, sometimes "No Thanks" doesn't cost nothing. As a female switch I can say beyond a shadow of a doubt that the risk of receiving talk-back from any Dom or sub I reject almost outweighs the merit of courtesy.
I know that does happen (because I've also experienced it from some very pushy subs!) but personally I have never given any "talk-back" - beyond something brief like "thanks anyway" - to someone who has clearly declined an offer from me, whether as a Dom or sub. I also have experience as the latter, but in whichever role I've always replied to someone who takes the trouble to write to me (beyond just "Hi" etc.)

I acknowledge talk-back may be more of a problem for females, or perhaps any of the "popular members" you mention, but whenever it's happened to me, I've just ignored or blocked them, depending on the site (I've never needed to investigate such functions on this one!) But, by ignoring someone's initial reply, isn't there an equal risk of being pestered? Maybe not; but I'm so old-fashioned that the first couple of times my ad replies met with silence, I wrote again in the genuine belief a breakdown of technology was more likely than one of courtesy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iSpuds View Post
Also, assuming that a sub is getting 20-50 messages in a week, as many popular members of this site do, chances are you'll slip between the cracks a lot on this site. Not even movie stars will take the time to hand-write a reply letter to their biggest fan. People have priorities and one must accept that one may not be very high on another's to-do list.
I admit I've never had the good fortune to receive "20-50 messages a week", or even a month, on this or any other site, especially if we're talking about initial contacts from different people. But, popular or not, those who can find time in their busy schedules to advertise should, in my opinion, also find the time to reply to those who've formulated a considered response to their ads. (That's the only situation I'm discussing, incidentally, not unsolicited "fan" messages.)

Last edited by Words; 02-01-2016 at 02:08 AM.
Words is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2016, 04:33 AM   #17
iSpuds
Starchy Sadist
 
iSpuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 921
Blog Entries: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Words View Post
[...]
I admit I've never had the good fortune to receive "20-50 messages a week", or even a month, on this or any other site, especially if we're talking about initial contacts from different people. But, popular or not, those who can find time in their busy schedules to advertise should, in my opinion, also find the time to reply to those who've formulated a considered response to their ads. (That's the only situation I'm discussing, incidentally, not unsolicited "fan" messages.)
(Don't worry, I try not to assume gender or orientation, which is why my post remained gender neutral )

Well, I'm sure you can appreciate that each sub's situation is unique. It's the same for each Dom's, and so I can't honestly say anything for certain; I don't know about your approach or the kinds of people you contact. In my personal experience (dealing with both people I've contacted and people who've contacted me), I find it extremely common that if someone has found a partner, they will cease contact on the site altogether. This is especially true for responses to ads that have been around for quite some time.

Perhaps it's to no fault of the correspondent (maybe an old ad got bumped or whatever) but, and I speak only own experience and no one else's, I rarely, rarely message back someone who has responded to my ad after a certain amount of time of already having found a partner (I mean I've been in a relationship for 8 months since my last ad and am still getting responses). Usually I'll turn down sub-par responses for up to a week. I will turn away people who send earnest and well-thought-out messages for two to three weeks before I run out of steam.

And that is just an example. There are many reasons why a person wouldn't respond. For me, work, school, and familial responsibilities alone will result in an unapologetic lack of correspondence. Sometimes, there's just something off about a person and I don't care to speak with them, whether they see something wrong or not. But that's just me. Many others have their reasons, as well.

Don't get me wrong; there are so, so many people on this site who simply do not care to extend let-down messages for no other reason than that they are not obligated to. But if you apply that thought to all people, you run the risk of becoming very bitter and others finding you unappealing or entitled (to their response).

The simple fact remains that while people could find the time to respond to those they reject, they don't have to. Many have what they feel is a good reason not to. And that's okay. Believing it's anything but okay, accusing people of lack of courtesy, will simply set you up for failure (and is a major downfall for a large number of individuals on this site).
__________________
No, I do not want to be your Mistress.
No, I do not want to be your slave.
So don't PM me about it!


Likes, Limits, and Fantasies (click)

A Domme with a Monkey.

The Monkey, the Potato, and the Book of Truth (AMA)


My PM Dares are Offline.
I don't participate in unsolicited PM dares, so don't ask.


"iSpuds used to be an onion before she realized that she wanted a simpler, layer free life. Gordon Ramsey himself agreed to perform the surgery, but when Nigella Lawson walked in during the middle of the procedure with a bottle of scotch, things went awry. Waking up as an iOS kernel trapped in a potato's body, iSpuds successfully sued the Food Channel for 13 quintillion Zimbabwe Shillings, and now lives in an exclusive, nano-sliver coated vegetable crisper." -Runesmith

"On a scale of 1-10, what's your favorite color of the Alphabet?"
"Prismarine!"

Last edited by iSpuds; 02-01-2016 at 04:37 AM.
iSpuds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2016, 06:21 AM   #18
Words
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 14
Default

To avoid prolonging this and sounding tiresomely detailed, I've deleted most of this post and will just say that, while I'm sure your points are absolutely valid for you and many others on this site, I've good reasons to believe they don't apply in my case.

I'll conclude with the ironic observation that your surfeit of responses and my dearth of them invoke Oscar Wilde's famous remark: "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."

Last edited by Words; 02-01-2016 at 10:35 AM.
Words is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc. - Also check out Kink Talk!reptilelaborer