Go Back   getDare Truth or Dare > Blogs > loke

Rating: 7 votes, 2.14 average.

Thanking Threads

Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:04 AM by loke

I noticed that threads seem to only get thanked when it is a well written post with amazing grammar. Does that mean those who have a hard time time trying to write well and those who have poor grammar (not on purpose of course) will never get their thread thanked?
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 2127 Comments 20
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 20

Comments

  1. Old Comment
    softeyes's Avatar
    Must really suck to never get your thread thanked.
    How does one go on!?


    PROTIP: You should just thank the threads you think needs thanking.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:11 AM by softeyes softeyes is offline
  2. Old Comment
    loke's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by softeyes View Comment
    Must really suck to never get your thread thanked.
    How does one go on!?


    PROTIP: You should just thank the threads you think needs thanking.
    Based on your protip, only the people who can think well (like know how to word everything) because if people has a hard time wording things, then people may not consider it a thread worthy to thank (me fortunetly, I look beyond people's writing inabilities so with me, everyone has an equal chance of getting their thread thanked), which therefore, people like that, will never get a thread thanked. Which to me, is just plain rude and disheartening. I wonder what ever happened to the days where people did not get judged based on their inabilities in life?
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:22 AM by loke loke is offline
  3. Old Comment
    softeyes's Avatar
    Dude, what people think is worth one of these precious "thanks" CAN varry, actually..

    You sound like that YOU don't thank posts that aren't spelled properly. It's not a general "fact" thing like you make it.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:26 AM by softeyes softeyes is offline
  4. Old Comment
    loke's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by softeyes View Comment
    Dude, what people think is worth one of these precious "thanks" CAN varry, actually..

    You sound like that YOU don't thank posts that aren't spelled properly. It's not a general "fact" thing like you make it.
    I don't thank any posts. I did once maybe twice. But since then, i don't thank anymore.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:30 AM by loke loke is offline
  5. Old Comment
    softeyes's Avatar
    It doesn't really mean a lot, you know.
    It's a teen site on the internet.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:34 AM by softeyes softeyes is offline
  6. Old Comment
    SlutPuppy's Avatar
    ...... Whats the big deal here? You get a post thanked, big whoop. ._. I don't think it's that important.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:35 AM by SlutPuppy SlutPuppy is offline
  7. Old Comment
    loke's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by softeyes View Comment
    It doesn't really mean a lot, you know.
    It's a teen site on the internet.
    It's can adult site too.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:39 AM by loke loke is offline
  8. Old Comment
    sweetsong's Avatar
    I don't think anyone thanks posts based on the grammar. o.O

    Another Loke blog.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:47 AM by sweetsong sweetsong is offline
  9. Old Comment
    Unless you actually compare every single thread and work out statistics, you don't really have a point. There really is no structure for "thanks". I'll "thank" for all sorts of reasons. The end of the day, it doesn't actually matter.

    Loke is back in business.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 09:56 AM by Slenderman - Doctor Slenderman - Doctor is offline
  10. Old Comment
    loke's Avatar
    I do like to thank those people that gives my blog one star because a one star rating is better than a no star rating.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 10:02 AM by loke loke is offline
  11. Old Comment
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by loke View Comment
    I do like to thank those people that gives my blog one star because a one star rating is better than a no star rating.
    Eh?

    Sometimes your logic makes me chuckle.

    If you see a blog with no rating, you have no opinion of said blog and go into it with an open mind. If you see a blog with a one-star rating, you immediately assume it's rubbish or disliked or whatever and go into it, if at all, with negative opinion/expectation.

    Jus' sayin'.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 10:06 AM by Slenderman - Doctor Slenderman - Doctor is offline
  12. Old Comment
    loke's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Doctor View Comment
    Eh?

    Sometimes your logic makes me chuckle.

    If you see a blog with no rating, you have no opinion of said blog and go into it with an open mind. If you see a blog with a one-star rating, you immediately assume it's rubbish or disliked or whatever and go into it, if at all, with negative opinion/expectation.

    Jus' sayin'.
    We obviously think differently. lol
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 10:12 AM by loke loke is offline
  13. Old Comment
    BettyBoop's Avatar
    I don't thank threads based purely on grammar and spelling. I usually thank threads I like or agree with ect.

    Back onto this topic, I don't rate a blog if I have no opinion on it.
    The star ratings, however, are clearly explained in the rating box.


    Posted 01-21-2011 at 12:04 PM by BettyBoop BettyBoop is offline
  14. Old Comment
    Jacques's Avatar
    How about having an unthank option: for posts (or blogs) which whine or moan about some irrelevant, meaningless subject and are actually a thinly veiled way for he poster to draw attention to themselves and attempt to claim the moral high ground over some non-issue, whilst criticising and/or pointlessly and endlessly debating everyone who has an opinion which is the slighest bit unlike their own?

    Or- good god- is this really the most interesting thing you can think of to blog about?
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 12:07 PM by Jacques Jacques is offline
  15. Old Comment
    BettyBoop's Avatar
    Did I ever mention that I love Jacques?
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 12:09 PM by BettyBoop BettyBoop is offline
  16. Old Comment
    Jacques's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BettyBoop View Comment
    Did I ever mention that I love Jacques?
    As far as i'm concerned you can mention it as often as you like- there are not enough stars in the sky to rate your awesomeness with, and I say that with no regard to the laws of spelling, punctuation or grammar!
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 12:18 PM by Jacques Jacques is offline
  17. Old Comment
    You can thank threads?!
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 12:43 PM by Stix Stix is offline
  18. Old Comment
    theone's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by loke View Comment
    I do like to thank those people that gives my blog one star because a one star rating is better than a no star rating.
    I see your blog has two stars. It’s only bad instead of terrible.

    Loke why are you always complaining about things that are not really all that important? Commenting on the thanks system is ok, but you seem to take trivial things far too serious.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 06:09 PM by theone theone is offline
  19. Old Comment
    DancingBear's Avatar
    I don't know about anyone else but I don't tend to read posts that are hard to understand because they are severely lacking in spelling/grammar.. thus I wouldn't thank it.
    Posted 01-21-2011 at 07:43 PM by DancingBear DancingBear is offline
  20. Old Comment
    Star Shadows's Avatar
    I only thank posts I like and agree with but I often don't often thank many posts at all. Grammar isn't a contributing factor. Again you are making an issue of a non issue
    Posted 01-22-2011 at 05:36 AM by Star Shadows Star Shadows is offline
 

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc. - Also check out Kink Talk!reptilelaborer