Loke, please, i'd stop being a Martyr and a Preacher. Sure, you're allowed to be who you are, not denying that, but you're denying people the right to say what they want by using the Bible...

That's one reason i'm an Agnostic in the first place, it's people who rant and rave if a Religious 'rule' is broken.

I was born a Catholic, Roman Catholic to be exact but i've never embraced my religion, and i'll never.

Well, I can't say I agree with loke nor sweet, but I know the christian community generally doesn't like using God's name in such manner. Um, personally, even I find it maybe a little too disrespectful? I mean, to think about it it's like putting your mother in like everyday talk, eg the phrase " Your Mom " Has always been there to insult. Even the phrase " Over my mother's dead body " Sounds a little not right.

I'm just saying it in a very, unbiased, rational manner. I hope O_o

Yes I agree with sweetsong. She is correct with the explanation above.

I do believe Davros was kicked out, not Doctor.

The only mod to ever get kicked out of our swanky private club is Doctor. It's sucks too cause I love the guy so damn much. Let us never speak of it again.

Ban, ban, ban, ban, ban!

No of course not. Mods can do whatever the hell they want to without any consequences.

Can mods get de-modded?

Yep

No it never happened but I guess he could de-admin/mod himself by shutting down his own site...

*runs to THE area and suggest we mods get a de-modding button*

Admin's on forums CAN"T get de-modded... Er, de-admined? They CAN give up the password and such though, to someone else, but that's all. o.O Or close the forum.

Depp is the admin, therefore he most likely didn't get demodded....

What a weird question^
I have noticed on other fourm sites it is easier to become a Mod.
I think that the one's on here work to hard to get to that status to ruin it all.

Incorrect- you would only be guilty of assault if you used disproportionate force- i.e. beyond that necessary to defend yourself or others- i.e. if you restrained someone to stop them from attacking you, you would be fine, but if you chased them down the street and beat them repeatedly with a cricket bat (as happened not long ago) you could and I would argue should be prosecuted- since you were no longer protecting yourself, but hurting them as some form of revenge. Also note- even if you were guilty of the offence- you may a. not be prosecuted as it the CPS would not deem it in the public interest b. be found not guilty by magistrates or juy or c. be found guilty but receive a much lighter punishment due to the circumstances or d. be found guilty and sentenced, but have the decision quashed or commuted on appeal.



Entirely true, in this case you can be prosecuted- by putting barbed wire out, you have created a hazard which could cause someone to hurt themselves- especially as you have presumably not warned anyone of the hazard. Consider that, not a burglar, but a neighbour's child who climbs over the wall to get a football, hurts themselves badly due to your barbed wire- clearly it is your fault, because you put the wire there fully knowing they could hurt themselves on it.

However- if you did not create the hazard, you would almost certainly not be liable for any harm- e.g. if a burglar cuts themselves breaking your window- you are not liable, as you have done nothing to make the window dangerous- the burglar's action in trying to break in has caused their injury. The fundamental legal point is that you owe some duty of care to anyone on your property, but the level of cared owed depends on the situation. So you owe a much higher duty of care to someone you invite into your home, and a much lesser duty to an intruder.

Welcome to the club. It’s been like that in England for a long time. You will find that your current situation it is only the thin end of the wedge.

Intruders actually prosecute house owners AND police for assault because they try to protect property. First of all I do think the situation in America of gun ownership and such goes way too far, and is certainly not a realistic option for the UK. We have gone to the other extreme in that you can get into serious trouble for attempting to defend yourself, family or property. You could be prosecuted for criminal assault.

It is also true that if an intruder hurts himself entering your property you can be prosecuted. If for instance you have barbed wire on your fence as a deterrent and an intruder gets hurt you can be in serious trouble. The police would not arrest you and march you to jail as you suggest, because it would not constitute criminal damage, but action could be taken under civil law.

thats not how it works, example, intruder comes in steals stuff, then you hit them with a bat, or shoot them. that's when you get punished, not if they trip and hurt themselves.

They played America the Beautiful at Church today. I enjoyed it. There really is nothing wrong with this, even if I am a man who thinks Church and State should be separate

More than likely they only did it because today is Independence Day.

Which almost certainly will be MBP, Trystan, Chloe or Dare.

If you want any of the other mods to do it (nicerly), then PM them. :P

Yes, of course This is actually the fastest way to get it done as the first mod that picks the report will be able to help with it.