11-07-2009, 04:30 PM | #1 |
getDare Addict
|
Does this signify ownership?
In your opinion, if a Master owns a Switch, who owns a slave...
Does that mean the Master owns the slave? And I say no.
__________________
With love, from your favourite administrator. ♥ 8==========)~~~~~~~~ WORSHIPS KANGAROOS |
11-07-2009, 04:35 PM | #2 |
Truth or Dare Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,522
|
No - unless there's an entirely separate contract between the master and the actual slave. Same as you don't get to play with their family without permission.
That's my take on it, anyway. |
11-07-2009, 11:29 PM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 22
|
No, I don't think that the Master owns the switch's slave but I do think that everything would go better for everyone if the Master approved of the slave. I find things work better if everyone is in agreement with the third party, things would go much smoother. If the Master hated the slave or the slave hated the Master things would get very awkward and bitter and that's just no good for anyone. Of course this goes out the window if the Master has already made a decree of "everything you own I own" but that's another situation entirely.
__________________
happily His slave Follow my slave blog at http://www.thoughts.com/spunSugar13/blog |
Advertisements |
|
|