legal age - Page 3

the reaper · 11-20-2007, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zeketheorc

Age should never matter. It seems we as americans created a high age limit, but before that there was no real age limit. The whole thing is really stupid since people have sex when they are that young anyways so whats the point?

im with you on that one for the most part anyways.

over the rainbow · 11-21-2007, 12:28 AM

I don't really think it matters. People are going to have sex if they want to have sex anyway. Why bother with a limit?

DareByrd · 11-26-2007, 06:49 PM

FREE LOVE MAN...hippie power!!!!!!....its not like you can stop people from having sex anyhow its just the way things are

Pikachu · 11-28-2007, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by over the rainbow

I don't really think it matters. People are going to have sex if they want to have sex anyway. Why bother with a limit?

too true if people want o there is no stopping them...

Ikon · 11-30-2007, 06:01 PM

Well obviously people have sex regardless but supposedly you cant give consent while your a minor, under 18. I think its fair, because alot of people dont know what they are doing, a majority, and stupid people shouldnt breed anyway, lol.

BettyBoop · 05-14-2009, 07:09 AM

I just think that is wrong in so many ways. I don't get why people can't just enjoy childhood/early teenage hood while they still have it without having sex with everything that moves.

rhode64 · 05-14-2009, 07:50 AM

My take on this is it is up to the individual no really has a right to tell you when you are ready I lost my virginity very young and dont regret it and would never preach to others .If and when you feel ready go for it and good luck hope you find the experience as enjoyable as I did.

ewitch · 05-14-2009, 08:47 AM

I think the interetations of the Romeo and Julliet laws posted are probably wrong. With Canadia, if you are 12 or 13 and have sex with someone 5 years younger then it is still a crime since whilst a 13 year olds may be able to consent even with a 9 year old the 9 year old cannot consent. Hence to make it legal both parties have to be atleast 12 and either over 14 or not more than 5 years apart.

BareButt · 05-14-2009, 10:44 AM

My personal opinion is that 16 is a reasonable age but obviously there are lots of people who have sex younger than that.

However, on the subject of stupid laws, there are currently 4 teenagers in the USA (2 girls, 2 boys, all about 13 or 14 I think) who have been charged with sexual offences because each of them posed naked while their friend took a photograph of them using a mobile phone and then sent it to one of the others (presumably the boys took naked photos of each other and sent them to the girls and vice-versa although this hasn't been made clear).

Now THAT'S ridiculous.

Anjelen · 05-14-2009, 11:02 AM

The youngest mother ever... was just five years old...

http://www.snopes.com/pregnant/medina.asp

11-26-2007, 06:49 PM	#33
DareByrd getDare Sweetheart Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 341	FREE LOVE MAN...hippie power!!!!!!....its not like you can stop people from having sex anyhow its just the way things are __________________ 26/m/sub Gay Kik me at dkb1992 Likes: orgasm denial, hypno, rules, dares, games of chance, occasionally chastity. Very open minded otherwise Limits: public, friends and family, blackmail, feminization, illegal, permanent damage, messy, scat

11-30-2007, 06:01 PM	#35
Ikon Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: USA, TN Posts: 125	Well obviously people have sex regardless but supposedly you cant give consent while your a minor, under 18. I think its fair, because alot of people dont know what they are doing, a majority, and stupid people shouldnt breed anyway, lol. __________________ PM if you wanna play Limits: Family, Friends, Public, Poo, Piss, Blood, Permanent Damage

05-14-2009, 07:09 AM	#36
BettyBoop Angel of Dare Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: England. Posts: 8,249 Blog Entries: 105	I just think that is wrong in so many ways. I don't get why people can't just enjoy childhood/early teenage hood while they still have it without having sex with everything that moves. __________________ ★Boop Boop de Boop.★ female, engurrland. Ask me anything, click. My tumblr. 18+ ▼ Last edited by BettyBoop; 12-09-2010 at 04:42 AM.

05-14-2009, 07:50 AM	#37
rhode64 getDare Patriot Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: England south coast Posts: 3,043 Blog Entries: 3	how young My take on this is it is up to the individual no really has a right to tell you when you are ready I lost my virginity very young and dont regret it and would never preach to others .If and when you feel ready go for it and good luck hope you find the experience as enjoyable as I did.

05-14-2009, 11:02 AM	#40
Anjelen Account Banned Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Rotterdam Posts: 1,286 Blog Entries: 1	Youngest Mother The youngest mother ever... was just five years old... http://www.snopes.com/pregnant/medina.asp __________________ Music by me: 'Suspense'(Reason v4.0) 'Keep your head up v0.1' (Fasttracker v2.09) * How to not be a Dumbinant * * Here's your chance to ask me anything! * "It's better to try and fail than to fail to try." [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] -- Nunc Intellego --

11-21-2007, 12:28 AM	#32
over the rainbow Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 5	I don't really think it matters. People are going to have sex if they want to have sex anyway. Why bother with a limit?

05-14-2009, 08:47 AM	#38
ewitch Distinguished Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: UK - London Posts: 600 Blog Entries: 1	I think the interetations of the Romeo and Julliet laws posted are probably wrong. With Canadia, if you are 12 or 13 and have sex with someone 5 years younger then it is still a crime since whilst a 13 year olds may be able to consent even with a 9 year old the 9 year old cannot consent. Hence to make it legal both parties have to be atleast 12 and either over 14 or not more than 5 years apart.

05-14-2009, 10:44 AM	#39
BareButt Junior Member Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 7	My personal opinion is that 16 is a reasonable age but obviously there are lots of people who have sex younger than that. However, on the subject of stupid laws, there are currently 4 teenagers in the USA (2 girls, 2 boys, all about 13 or 14 I think) who have been charged with sexual offences because each of them posed naked while their friend took a photograph of them using a mobile phone and then sent it to one of the others (presumably the boys took naked photos of each other and sent them to the girls and vice-versa although this hasn't been made clear). Now THAT'S ridiculous.