Casey Anthony Trial - Page 7

snup · 07-05-2011, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slave1987

Two reasons immediately spring to mind, either the risk of a false positive or the hope that the police doing a thorough investigation would clear them anyway.

are lye detectors amissable? I didnt think they could be used as evidence

luvNgrl · 07-05-2011, 12:31 PM

Wow I am shocked. She is gonna probably walk out of there Thursday...thats crazy. She should have at least got something. What is our world coming to that 12 people could not find her guilty of even a lesser charge...something's wrong with that.

Voiceless_Frame · 07-05-2011, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snup

are lye detectors amissable? I didnt think they could be used as evidence

Only if both parties agree to them.

Voiceless_Frame · 07-05-2011, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luvNgrl

Wow I am shocked. She is gonna probably walk out of there Thursday...thats crazy. She should have at least got something. What is our world coming to that 12 people could not find her guilty of even a lesser charge...something's wrong with that.

She will most likely get time served for the misdemeanor count of lieing to a law enforcement officer

snup · 07-05-2011, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voiceless_Frame

Only if both parties agree to them.

thats just stupid, if you are "guilty" on a detector then course you wont allow it to be used.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voiceless_Frame

She will most likely get time served for the misdemeanor count of lieing to a law enforcement officer

reading about it (very late she might walk cause of time served already)

Voiceless_Frame · 07-05-2011, 12:40 PM

[QUOTE=snup;489202]thats just stupid, if you are "guilty" on a detector then course you wont allow it to be used.

Well Polygraphs can be wrong, which can play in the favor of either parties.

CollaredBlondie · 07-05-2011, 12:42 PM

If she did have any involvement, then she has to live with that knowledge for the rest of her life, which is probably the best thing for her. If she really didn't do it, then she probably knew who did, or knew something. This sort of thing happens every day, all over the world, unfortunately.

Edit: Yeah, changed my post. Read back a bit and decided to write something more relevant. *Shrug.*

Voiceless_Frame · 07-05-2011, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CollaredBlondie

Hasn't she just been found not guilty?

On all counts except for the misdemeanor counts of lieing to law enforcement

jeff10145 · 07-05-2011, 12:52 PM

I am sorry and by this i dont mean to offend anyone but who knows what really happend only the person who did it does. yes things point to her but that doesnt mean she did it i mean thins pointed to michael Jackson molesting young kids but he was found not guilty and not a lot of people cared he was found not guilty and i am not saying he was either i am just saying she is getting a lot of mean stuff for this and she might not of even done it. so we cant say this worl is corrupt because there are reasons that those 12 people talked about that they thought she was innocent and those reasons may never be revealed so belive what you want and who knows she may of done it but like i said we will never know the truth she was found not guilty we cant change it.

bodacious · 07-05-2011, 02:12 PM

I'm just curious, but what did those jurors know that the rest of America didn't? Some of them had kids, so it had to be something about this case that everyone else wasn't aware of if they all unanimously agreed.
Now, legally she has been proven innocent. But most of society will not accept that ruling. I honestly hope there was evidence that made it impossible for them to find her guilty. Because, she sure as hell doesn't look innocent to me.

nellybell · 07-05-2011, 03:19 PM

I assume that many of them think she was somehow involved in the death of the child but the government didn't prove beyond reasonible doubt that she did it. There was no one piece of information that incriminated her fully.

She is only innocent in the fact that there wasn't enough solid proof to say otherwise. Innocent until proven guilty.

slave1987 · 07-05-2011, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snup

are lye detectors amissable? I didnt think they could be used as evidence

Believe that they are generally inadmisable in court but a false reading could tie up resources and stop other avenues of investigation being looked at.

Memories for Life · 07-05-2011, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slave1987

Two reasons immediately spring to mind, either the risk of a false positive or the hope that the police doing a thorough investigation would clear them anyway.

Strange that other reasons didn't "spring" to mind! The one where you had every thing to do with covering up how the child died or that the grandfather was Caylee's biological father! Those would two reasons that you wouldn't want asked during a test which was supposed to "exclude" you from suspicion!

Memories for Life · 07-05-2011, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luvNgrl

Wow I am shocked. She is gonna probably walk out of there Thursday...thats crazy. She should have at least got something. What is our world coming to that 12 people could not find her guilty of even a lesser charge...something's wrong with that.

Those 12 people used their common sense to make their decision. They didn't believe "she should be found guilty of something" weak case that these bozo prosecution tried to "slide" by without proving a thing! Does "innocent until PROVEN guilty" ring a bell? They also probably thought that the District Attorney laughing during the case wasn't exactly helping his credibility!

Memories for Life · 07-05-2011, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bodacious

I'm just curious, but what did those jurors know that the rest of America didn't? Some of them had kids, so it had to be something about this case that everyone else wasn't aware of if they all unanimously agreed.
Now, legally she has been proven innocent. But most of society will not accept that ruling. I honestly hope there was evidence that made it impossible for them to find her guilty. Because, she sure as hell doesn't look innocent to me.

I think that was one of the key provisions the defense used when making their jury selections. "Can you determine guilt or innocence based solely on the evidence presented and not because she LOOKS quilty?"

07-05-2011, 12:31 PM	#92
luvNgrl Senior Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: US Posts: 161 Blog Entries: 3	Wow I am shocked. She is gonna probably walk out of there Thursday...thats crazy. She should have at least got something. What is our world coming to that 12 people could not find her guilty of even a lesser charge...something's wrong with that. __________________ 30/f/US. Lover of dinosaurs and cheese Submissive of Master Balki Likes: humiliation, being controlled, pet play, bondage, spanking, anal, orgasm control/denial, light pain Dislikes: more than light pain, age play, pee/poo control, annoying drivers Limits: family, illegal, permanent Toys: rope, vibes, hitachi, anal plugs, suction dildo, lovense lush

07-05-2011, 12:52 PM	#99
jeff10145 Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: us Posts: 206 Blog Entries: 5	i am sorry I am sorry and by this i dont mean to offend anyone but who knows what really happend only the person who did it does. yes things point to her but that doesnt mean she did it i mean thins pointed to michael Jackson molesting young kids but he was found not guilty and not a lot of people cared he was found not guilty and i am not saying he was either i am just saying she is getting a lot of mean stuff for this and she might not of even done it. so we cant say this worl is corrupt because there are reasons that those 12 people talked about that they thought she was innocent and those reasons may never be revealed so belive what you want and who knows she may of done it but like i said we will never know the truth she was found not guilty we cant change it. __________________ Likes: Humiliation, Control/TPE, Tease and Denial (edging) a little anal, mild pain, chastity, maybe a little public Pet play, degradation, teasing (meaning fun name calling Etc),Nipple play, bondage, gags, whips and crops Dislikes: cum play, too much anal, toothpaste, corner time, writing line or essays Limits: extreme pain, scat, family too public (hidden is fine), Blood, Permanent Damage Messy (some is okay)

07-05-2011, 02:12 PM	#100
bodacious Distinguished Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: In the dirty south. Posts: 586 Blog Entries: 12	I'm just curious, but what did those jurors know that the rest of America didn't? Some of them had kids, so it had to be something about this case that everyone else wasn't aware of if they all unanimously agreed. Now, legally she has been proven innocent. But most of society will not accept that ruling. I honestly hope there was evidence that made it impossible for them to find her guilty. Because, she sure as hell doesn't look innocent to me. __________________ Likes: anal, degradation, humiliation, insertions, pain, nipple torture, spanking, double penetration, enemas. Limits/Dislikes: ANY public, friends/family, messy, diaper play. Toys: so many butt plugs, a couple of vibrators, a Hitachi magic wand, ball gag, rope, handcuffs, crotchless panties, nipple clamps, 2qt enema bag, anal beads and anal hook Hard dicks make me horny Spoiler: Fuck you and your feelings. :)

07-05-2011, 03:19 PM	#101
nellybell Truth or Dare Enthusiast Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: In front of the computer, staring vacantly. Posts: 2,812 Blog Entries: 14	I assume that many of them think she was somehow involved in the death of the child but the government didn't prove beyond reasonible doubt that she did it. There was no one piece of information that incriminated her fully. She is only innocent in the fact that there wasn't enough solid proof to say otherwise. Innocent until proven guilty. __________________ There was a nelly, a very smelly enchanted nelly sweet as vegemite could be ahaha just kidding, but still loved just the same <3

07-05-2011, 12:40 PM	#96
Voiceless_Frame Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 33	[QUOTE=snup;489202]thats just stupid, if you are "guilty" on a detector then course you wont allow it to be used. Well Polygraphs can be wrong, which can play in the favor of either parties.