Man vs. Machine: A Spanking Add Thread

[Dungeonmaster]

Originally Posted by delaneythenerd

I can give her the humiliation of losing to a "loser". That's something you can't give her.

Who's a loser, Laney?

[delaneythenerd]

Originally Posted by tzzzr

You mean your not committed to us?

Committed to winning.

[tzzzr]

Actually this should say.

Originally Posted by delaneythenerd

Committed to whining.

[Dungeonmaster]

Originally Posted by delaneythenerd

It's on my to-do list! I've been busy. Would a loser have as many work and social commitments as I do? I don't think so.

I don't care in which lockers you were locked or where you have been hung by your panties.
Who's a loser?

[delaneythenerd]

Originally Posted by Dungeonmaster

I don't care in which lockers you were locked or where you have been hung by your panties.
Who's a loser?

Looks like we've still got at least 300 posts to go before we know that.

[tzzzr]

Originally Posted by delaneythenerd

Looks like we've still got at least 300 posts to go before we know that.

Getting a little sassy aren't we?

[Dungeonmaster]

Originally Posted by delaneythenerd

Looks like we've still got at least 300 posts to go before we know that.

And you have one post to avoid trouble

[delaneythenerd]

Originally Posted by tzzzr

Getting a little sassy aren't we?

Just trying to keep interest up. Nobody likes an unstirred pot.

[tzzzr]

Originally Posted by delaneythenerd

Just trying to keep interest up. Nobody likes an unstirred pot.

Sounds like fun.....

[Dungeonmaster]

Originally Posted by Dungeonmaster

And you have one post to avoid trouble

Enjoy what you just got

[Manarus]

Originally Posted by delaneythenerd

I don't think that's true, I think you've been curious about switching ever since you joined. But let me lay out my point of view for you.

First of all, we're only comparing self-spanking. The biggest drawback people find to spanking machines is that they eliminate the spanker/spankee dynamic, and I understand that. After all, I don't solely use my spanking machine — I get spanked by my husband, too! However, as Stealthy doesn't have someone to spank her for this thread, it's a moot point.

When it comes to self-spanking for getDare, the machine gives you more control as the person assigning the spankings. If you tell someone to spank themselves hard, you don't know how hard it's actually going to be. What is "hard" to them? Are they going to go easy on themselves? Are they going to subconsciously spank lighter and lighter as the pain starts to kick in?

With a machine, you could give me a strength and a duration and know that I'm going to get a consistent spanking free from my own biases. If I set the machine to a strength of 5, it's going to be the same strength all the way through.

So while a machine doesn't replicate what makes person-to-person spanking great, in terms of self-spanking I believe that it actually gives you more control as the "virtual spanker" than a normal self-spanking would.

A very good pleading for machine, indeed, I have to say! However, still not a convincing point for me to switch. I will eventually join the side who suggests the most fun punishment
By the way, on what strength level will you perform your machine spanks?

As for the question of the formula for the possible additional cunt spanks for the looser, I would design it in such a way that the more spanks the looser has, the less spanks he has to perform. E.g. when the race is very close, less cunt spanks have to be performed, but if one wins with a big difference, a lot of cunt spanks have to be performed.

(Also, the overall punishment at the end could be designed in a way so the spanks for the looser is a parameter. E.g. the less spanks the looser has to perform, the heavier the punishment would be.)

So I would suggest the formula: CuntSpanks = (1- LooserSpanks/TotalSpanks) * WinnerSpanks

This still means at least 50% of the winner spanks to the cunt if the race is close, but a 100% if there is a big difference. There could be introduced another factor, to reduce the 50% and 100% a bit as it seems quite a lot

[tzzzr]

Originally Posted by Manarus

So I would suggest the formula: CuntSpanks = (1- LooserSpanks/TotalSpanks) * WinnerSpanks

This still means at least 50% of the winner spanks to the cunt if the race is close, but a 100% if there is a big difference. There could be introduced another factor, to reduce the 50% and 100% a bit as it seems quite a lot

That is a better way to do it.

[Manarus]

glad you like the idea Hopefully Delaney includes my both ideas in her excel sheet.

[Dungeonmaster]

The punishment won't be up to delaney though

[Manarus]

If she should come up with a better punishment than kitten, then we will make it happen. Otherwise not