Quote:
Originally Posted by marissa353
I hope I'm not coming off as antagonistic and I don't want to monopolize too much of your time, but I just want to follow up one more time since I already went in on this topic.
I can accept this is just the way it is, but I am still confused by the contradictions.
I don't understand why links to nudes is wrong when ads go to sites with hardcore pornography on the first page your sent to.
I also don't understand why links to nudes is wrong when you can not only have a profile picture of nude cartoons engaging in a sex act, but it can also be an animated gif. At least properly labeled links force you to opt in to seeing it where as the animated sex acts can only be avoided once you've already seen it.
Again, I'm not trying to be a brat or make your lives difficult. It's just a topic that I've seen people have confusion on for as long as I've been here and I'm trying to provide as constructive of criticism as possible. <3
|
The difference is that with the ads, and with the cartoon porn, we know for absolute certain that there is not children in the pictures.