04-11-2018, 07:38 PM
|
#166
|
|
Prodigy
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: My Cage
Posts: 4,649
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake dare
415. Interesting, I would have thought it was more along the lines of keeping them from getting hard?
416. What about chemical castration?
|
415. Nah, it's easier to insert sounds or hurt with stomping if they're hard.
416. I have 4 problems with chemical castration:
1. It's reversible.
2. It's expensive to maintain.
3. It's not as humiliating as looking down and seeing the lack of balls.
4. I wouldn't get to have bloody fun playing with the excised testicles 
__________________
Spoiler:
If you're in a denial thread, add 1 day of denial. :rolleyes:
This spoiler only counts once per thread per day.
|
|
|