Certain forms of porn banned in UK, protest coming.
|
I agree with your point of view but protesting never achieves anything. It will get a lot of press attention but ultimately nothing will change.
|
I have read this the other day in the news, I think this is absolutely unreasonable.
|
If I'm honest here. Well done for those standing up and trying to do something 'right' and all but.. there are more problems in the world to worry about.. and proteSt about. Okay this will effect some groups of people but over all its not going to effect masses. You know there are dying ppeople in the world? People getting horribly tortured on a day to day bases..
If anyone should be protesting about porn they should be protesting and fighting for those who are forced into the porn industry.. My opinion anyway |
Shibari, while I respect your opinion and completely agree that there are bigger problems, (and the one that you mention is a huge problem) I think that standing up against any wrong is good. In this case, this topic is currently in the news so a protest now will be more effective than one at another time at drawing attention to this particular issue. If we pick and choose what wrongs to stand up against based on a priority list, we'll pass up many opportunities to make the world a better place.
|
The ill defined socialism strikes again. In the age of social welfare system being drained by massive abuse of it, at the brink of recession the ever vigilant government finds what's important to protect the people from their own freedom.
I say they are probing the ground. First certain content gets banned "for public safety"(what a crap) and once the technology has been tested it's used to start a full blown censorship. It's difficult to press "we want to censor what you watch" but when they dress it up nicely in "we want to protect the children from harmful influence" those who see that it is wrong, are marked as enemy of a decent society. |
Quote:
|
it will never work because no MP will ever stand up for it because if they do they will be ridiculed as a pervert and will never be voted into parliament again, they wont throw their job away for some porn
|
I know it won't work, a lot of people are willing to give up a lot of freedom to feel like they're safe.
|
@Shibari
Go on and make a protest about poverty - now this is pointless as no law can abolish poverty (some totalitarian countries have tried it which led to "glorious wealth of nation and no poverty"... on paper) Protests about people being tortured - it happens mostly in 3rd world countries that don't give a rats ass about human rights in general and the regimes there are so well established, that only external military intervention would remove them. Intervention that would not be approved by publicity in a rich country because it harms the sovereignty of the invaded country and is extremely expensive. This on the other hand is the government trying to take something away from the people they are meant to serve. Your freedom ends where another persons freedom begins, which means if I want to die by being suffocated during face sitting session with a BBW it's my right. If I don't want to get suffocated, bu watching such scenes gets me going why forbid me from watching it? Next step would be to ban sextoys from sale and license for buying ropes. I don't need a government to protect me from my own ideas - if my idea is so stupid that I'd die of it - so be it. It's my right. Finally, whatever is forbidden will lead to the underground taking it over. In extreme, unsafe and often forced version. Remember prohibition in the States? The recent case of teenager who was smuggling and selling candies in public school that banned them from school store. He earned quite some cash. http://www.forbes.com/sites/karstens...-market-candy/ Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Missed my point completely |
Also if you read into it the reasons for these bans are apparently because it may encourage people to imitate the actions in the videos. In other words they want to discourage things like face sitting female ejaculation, anything that they seem to find inappropriate. It really upsets me that politicians seem to think of themselves as experts in what is good for people, if I want to engage in a legal sexual act I will I don't want some snobs who live off of others work telling me what's right and what's wrong. If nobody who is of I'll mental health or does not give consent is harmed then what's the problem? If somebody is injured during sex that is their mistake, we shouldn't all have to have what we are able to see censored. If a child has access to poem then it is the parent or guardians fault not the fact that there is porn. It's much like if someone finds a knife and stabs themselves it's not the fault of the manufacturer. I'm not so much angry about the porn being banned I'm angry about politicians seeming to think they can tell us what is good and what is bad.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.