What'd you rather?
What would you rather do:
A) no touching any "parts" for a month B) not able to use the toilet for a month C) no undies (includes bra) for a month D) having to piss yourself at the shop with no undies on in front of at least 20 people. |
No undies for a month.
I couldn,t go a month without the others and i dont want to piss myself in front of others. |
A) not touching any "parts" for a month
B) not able to use the toilet for a month C) no undies (includes bra) for a month D) having to piss yourself at the shop with no undies on in front of at least 20 people. I'd go with A. Not using the toilet for a month would be awkward.. and disgusting.. eww.. No undies for a month.. that would make changing for P.E awkward.. And.. peeing on myself in public.. that's just gross and embarrasing.. eww .. |
Definitely A for me.
|
C for me! I go without a couple times a week anyway so it's no big deal!!
|
C) no undies (includes bra) for a month
|
I'm going to buck the trend and say A!
I think I could do it |
If I had to choose it would be C. I could live without undies for a month, the rest are nasty and I want to touch myself. :p
|
A) not touching any "parts" for a month --> There's a special month where we must fully behave, unable to feel arouse. Which means It's a feat that is not impossible to perform.
B) not able to use the toilet for a month --> But can release in the backyard or plastic instead? Troublesome! The toilet is design for a purpose! C) no undies (includes bra) for a month --> I think its easier for boys to perform this task. Wait...it would be difficult if I was running around playing soccer, basketball or volleyball wearing only short pants. D) having to piss yourself at the shop with no undies on in front of at least 20 people. --> No. Absolutely no. That leaves me with A as my answer. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.